{"id":1097,"date":"2019-05-15T15:56:27","date_gmt":"2019-05-15T15:56:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/?p=1097\/"},"modified":"2019-05-16T15:03:48","modified_gmt":"2019-05-16T15:03:48","slug":"outcome-of-endodontic-microsurgery-using-mineral-trioxide-aggregate-or-root-repair-material-as-root-end-filling-material-a-randomized-controlled-trial-with-cone-beam-computed-tomographic-evaluation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/2019\/05\/15\/outcome-of-endodontic-microsurgery-using-mineral-trioxide-aggregate-or-root-repair-material-as-root-end-filling-material-a-randomized-controlled-trial-with-cone-beam-computed-tomographic-evaluation\/","title":{"rendered":"CONSORT RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Root Repair Material as Root-end Filling Material: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation<\/h2>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3>Authors<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">Chafic Safi, DMD, MS,<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">Meetu R. Kohli, BDS, DMD<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">Samuel I. Kratchman, DMD<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">Frank C. Setzer, DMD, PhD, MS<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">Bekir Karabucak, DMD, MS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Abstract<\/h3>\n<p><strong> Introduction:<\/strong> The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate healing after endodontic microsurgery (EMS) using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) versus EndoSequence root repair material (RRM; Brasseler, Savannah, GA) as root-end filling materials.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Methods:<\/strong> Two hundred forty-three teeth with persistent or recurrent apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to either the MTA or RRM group. EMS was performed, and follow-up visits with clinical and radiographic investigation were scheduled at 6, 12, and 24 months with follow-up cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging after 12 months.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Results:<\/strong> One hundred twenty teeth with an average follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. The overall success rate was 93.3% for periapical (PA) evaluation and 85% for CBCT evaluation. The RRM group exhibited 92% and 84% success rates as assessed on PA and CBCT imaging, respectively. The MTA group exhibited 94.7% and 86% success rates as assessed on PA and CBCT imaging, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Microsurgical classification, root canal filling quality, root-end filling material depth, and root fracture were found to be significant outcome predictors.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusions:<\/strong> EMS is a predictable procedure with successful outcome both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiographic evaluation when RRM or MTA was used as the root-end filling material. (J Endod 2019;-:1\u20139.)<\/p>\n<h3><em><a href=\"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/PIIS0099239919302547.pdf\">Read full article here !<\/a><\/em><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/PIIS0099239919302547.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-1115 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-16-at-10.52.22-AM-1-223x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"223\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-16-at-10.52.22-AM-1-223x300.png 223w, https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Screen-Shot-2019-05-16-at-10.52.22-AM-1.png 258w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 223px) 100vw, 223px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Root Repair Material as Root-end Filling Material: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1109,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,44,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-case-study","category-etude-de-cas-case-study-en","category-etudes-de-cas-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1097"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/endostlaurent.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}